tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7755136273253085483.post7138926834077465152..comments2024-03-21T15:44:25.378+01:00Comments on CCMA's blog: Notes about sync redundancyValeri Loukinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11915389342131738939noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7755136273253085483.post-70438491165877569622014-09-17T02:15:43.537+02:002014-09-17T02:15:43.537+02:00My dear colleague Pavel, I cannot be more agreed w...My dear colleague Pavel, I cannot be more agreed with you! I´ve been working with CP technologies around 6 years. Some CISCO'S coworkers, told me that I must leave from the dark side. and return to the light, cause I´m Cisco certificated too. But, some people just need constantly challenges. And thats is CP a world of unlimited challenges !!. I have respect for Valeri, but, I believe that you are not overreacting, because is the truth, CP use their customers like beta testers. Have no idea how many clients told me that in my entire carrer.<br /><br />Best regards,<br /><br />Mario Jr.Snakemindhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01195012109590025011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7755136273253085483.post-11067667974802627432014-05-17T15:49:56.546+02:002014-05-17T15:49:56.546+02:00Thanks for note. Why? I'm not sure of the cost...Thanks for note. Why? I'm not sure of the cost/benefit of making the switch-what does it buy you? On 1 cluster its easy, try doing it on 600 clusters in change control environment.<br /><br />The switch to GAIA was bad bad bad. I think things will get better in the future now that we are over the hump and doing QA releases.Dreezmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05749285803449212137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7755136273253085483.post-91074175935254304552014-05-15T11:22:21.758+02:002014-05-15T11:22:21.758+02:00Do not overreact, Pavel. Yes, there is a certain f...Do not overreact, Pavel. Yes, there is a certain fall in quality of Check Point products lately, at least it seems so. I can do nothing about it.<br /><br />If you would look onto the quoted cases though, you would see, there is nothing critical about them. Bonds are working fine, there are just some minor LACP cosmetics and "might be" misbehaviour in a limited number of scenarios. <br /><br />Yes, it is annoying. But at least it is fixable and known, before you configure.Valeri Loukinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11915389342131738939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7755136273253085483.post-56546759444350918192014-05-15T11:16:26.348+02:002014-05-15T11:16:26.348+02:00Jesus..
Valeri, I`d really like to know your opini...Jesus..<br />Valeri, I`d really like to know your opinion on the quality of check point code nowadays.<br />Last 3 or 4 projects involving CP I`ve done were (and some of them still are) a nightmare. Bug after bug, support cases opened one after another. OSPF peers dropped, CPU skyrocketing, crashes, voip drops, dozens of problems solved (or not) by hotfixes.<br />"Using bond interfaces with Check Point is tricky."<br />Bonding interfaces is a mature technology, been here for ages. Why would we need 3 (!) hotfixes to make it work?<br />It seems that software testing is performed after the release, using customers as beta-testers.<br />Do you agree? Or is there any magic way to make it work from the beginning?rel1ct0https://www.blogger.com/profile/11053828557087814525noreply@blogger.com